Archives: Nuclear Strategy & Nonproliferation Initiative Articles and Op-Eds

How Should the U.S. Handle North Korea?

  • By
  • Jeffrey G. Lewis,
  • New America Foundation
May 3, 2009 |

Within Washington, a consensus seems to have emerged that the Obama administration will have to wait for North Korean leader Kim Jong-il to die before re-engaging with Pyongyang.

It worked so well with Fidel Castro.

The RRW's Vacuum Tube Myth

  • By
  • Jeffrey G. Lewis,
  • New America Foundation
  • and Kingston Reif

Since last fall, Air Force Gen. Kevin Chilton, commander of U.S. Strategic Command, has been stumping for the so-called Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) Program, which would develop new nuclear warheads to swap into the U.S. arsenal. In a sit-down with Wall Street Journal editors last November, Chilton held aloft a prop to make his case: "I remember what these things were for. I bet you don't. It's a vacuum tube. My father used to take these out of the television set in the 1950s and 1960s down to the local supermarket to test them and replace them."

After the Reliable Replacement Warhead

  • By
  • Jeffrey G. Lewis,
  • New America Foundation
December 1, 2008 |

The Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) as envisioned by the Bush administration is effectively dead. This past fall, for the second year in a row, the Democratic Congress zeroed out funding for the RRW program despite Bush administration claims that extending the life of the current warhead types in the U.S. nuclear stockpile would, at some distant point in the future, lead to a sharp uptick in aging-related defects.

Drawing a Red Line With Iran

  • By
  • Anatol Lieven,
  • New America Foundation
  • and Trita Parsi

The George Bush administration's decision to open direct contacts with Iran is to be welcomed, but precisely because it marks such a break with previous U.S. policy, it also carries a great danger.

This is that hard-liners in the American and Israeli governments will treat this Western proposal as a last chance for the Iranians, to be followed by an attack if Tehran fails to accept it.

Minimum Deterrence

  • By
  • Jeffrey G. Lewis,
  • New America Foundation

Nuclear deterrence is a rather subjective concept: How many weapons are enough to ensure deterrence? How difficult is it to achieve and maintain deterrence? How important are the technical details of a country’s nuclear forces, such as the size, configuration, and readiness, to the goal of maintaining deterrence? The answers to these questions vary across recent history and across geographic areas.

Disappearing Act: Rendition by the Numbers

  • By
  • Peter Bergen,
  • Katherine Tiedemann,
  • New America Foundation
March 3, 2008 |

An extraordinary rendition may be defined as the extrajudicial transfer of an individual to a country where there is reasonable probability he will be tortured. In our research we have counted 67 known cases of extraordinary rendition by the United States since 1995. While the details are often incomplete, they help paint a more complete picture of this secretive and controversial Central Intelligence Agency program.

Five Myths About the Bomb and Us

  • By
  • Jeffrey G. Lewis,
  • New America Foundation
December 2, 2007 |

The Bush administration likes to boast that it has dramatically cut the size of the nation's nuclear stockpile. Meanwhile, it's busily trying to shore up congressional support for multibillion-dollar proposals to "modernize" the bristling U.S. arsenal. A world that's skeptical about the last superpower's intentions only gets more so when U.S. officials push unconvincing lines about the world's deadliest weapons. So here are a few myths about the U.S. nuclear posture of which the administration seems particularly fond.

Nuclear Weapons in the Age of al-Qaeda

  • By
  • Jeffrey G. Lewis,
  • New America Foundation
  • and Ivo Daalder, Brookings Institution
August 13, 2007 |

Should the US ever rule out the use of nuclear weapons in particular circumstances?

This question is at the heart of the latest exchange between senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama as they compete for the presidential nomination of the Democratic party.

Syndicate content